+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: Rubyfelixir VS Humble Speculative Freemason

  1. #21
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default

    YOU KNOW THAT THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A TREASURE-HUNT COMPETITION IS HAVING BIT OF A LAUGH AT YOUR EXPENSE WHEN

    in the event of a tie with another competitor, whether you win or not, is determined not by your understanding of, and skill, at solving the treasure-hunt puzzle, but by your knowledge of, and skill, at writing an original Poetic Epigram in the form of a rhyming couplet!

  2. #22
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default

    YOU KNOW THAT YOU WERE CHEATED AND LIED TO WHEN THE COMPANY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TREASURE-HUNT MARKETS THE PUZZLE BOOK FOR THE HUNT TO THE PUBLIC BY BLAZING A BANNER ACROSS THE FRONT OF THE BOOK THAT STATES "The Holy Grail and Da Vinci Secrets revealed" AND THEN

    seven years later in an interview, a director of that company, who was also the competition's sole official representative, states that the words "The Holy Grail" are just an allusion to anything considered immensely precious and difficult to achieve!

    QUOTE
    The Director of Priory Publications GB LTD
    "And that is my explanation of what the Holy Grail is, it is a phrase, adopted by a group to become a common term to describe something they treasure and wish to keep secret. They think it powerful and beautiful, and they are truly custodians of it. This also means that there is probably more than one Grail, as it is likely that anyone who had a relic or secret through that period would have referred to their prize as ‘The Grail’. Our challenge is to be sure we are not mixing one person’s Grail with someone else’s, which I think has happened several times, not just in modern research, but in historic references too.

    Damn, I hope that makes sense. As for the <my bold> Grail of Maranatha? Yes, it is real and it is definitely historic."
    Six Questions with DB: Author of Maranatha-Et in Arcadia Ego » Mysterious Writings

  3. #23
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default Who's Bad.

    YOU KNOW SOMETHING STRANGE IS GOING ON WHEN THE FAILURE OF THE TREASURE HUNT COMPETITION AND THE DISSOLUTION OF THE COMPANY THAT WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COMPETITION IS

    ascribed by the SAME Director in three separate explanations made at three different times to three different things.

    The First Explanation.
    THE BAD LUCK.


    The company was dissolved so that it could litigate against an individual who made false claims about the company's members to the company's prospective business partners that caused those partners to withdraw their financial support.
    "Initial replies stated that the companies were reviewing their financial commitment, so had to withdraw their proposals. Although, in private conversations we were led to believe that they had been contacted by an anonymous individual claiming that Priory Publications (GB) Ltd, was not operating legitimately"."
    These assaults were made anonymously by email using the Internet and "were coming from a location outside the United Nations".

    MY NOTE
    Independent Nation States
    not in the UN: Taiwan, Kosovo,
    Vatican City, and Palestine.


    "We could not have predicted the hostile attacks we have had to face, or that we would be virtually powerless to act against them on legal grounds due the location of the party and that they could continue even after prosecution. Although, we have been advised that as we can prove that the project faulted due to these events the process of legal action against these individuals changes. Unlike before, when any legal action would be ineffective in practically stopping the damage to the business, now that the business has halted there is no risk of further damage."

    OR IS IT
    The Second Explanation.
    THE INVESTORS AND THE CONSUMERS.


    "[...]the actual failure of the project was down to the world economic situation.", and not "powerful individuals" who have made "clandestine efforts to suppress the work".

    Huh.
    Well, alright then... Although that seems like an odd thing about what it was not, that he felt compelled to make clear.

    OR IS IT
    The Third Explanation.
    THE BANK.


    The company was locked out its own bank account and prevented from accessing its own funds due to the type of bureaucratic nightmare logic trap that you hear about and hope never to experience, which meant that their "account had been frozen for three quarters of a year. We could not take orders or funds, and neither could we pay any funds from our account. The company survived on the personal funds of the Team and supporters. This basically covered the operational costs. We had to cancel all orders, as we could not pay for the storage, dispatch and replenishing of stock, as every cent we earnt was locked in an account we couldn’t use."

    This third explanation, in full, is so bizarre and pernicious that it makes one believe that "powerful individuals" making "clandestine efforts" might have indeed been involved.

    The company considered taking legal action against the bank, but decided that "on legal advise, we were told it would take another six to eight months just to get the case to court, let alone winning and surviving any appeal. The company, nor its debtors, could survive that long with the debt that was incurred. Hence, the closing of the company and the project."

    The third explanation, of a court case against a bank, would appear to contradict the first explanation, of a court case against a hostile, horrible, solitary individual,
    BUT NOT if the person engaged in the anonymous attacks that destroyed the company's ability to make new money, was also a person who worked for the bank at which the company had its account. An account to which the company lost access to the funds of, when the electronic information for who could access the account, and withdraw funds, developed a vindictive company killing quirk. A fault in the bank's own system that the bank, oddly, refused to acknowledge or correct for 9 months.

    BUT ULTIMATELY

    QUOTE THE DIRECTOR "I acknowledge some people didn’t like what we were trying and went to great lengths to stop us, but in honesty we failed because of initial ignorance, global financial breakdown, and an insane amount of ‘Bad Luck’."

    So, you can see, it was not anyone's fault that the treasure-hunt competition failed. No. It was not the fault of the product itself. Nor the fault of any decision made by the Director of the company. Nor the disinterest of the consumers or the lack of aid by the investors. Nor the weird attitude of a bank towards a fault in their own system, that destroyed a company, by destroying that company's ability to do business by denying that company access to its own funds. It, most certainly, was not the fault of a person who maliciously and repeatedly attacked the company, and severely damaged the company's ability to do business with other companies. No. If any one thing was to blame, it was only the fault of the faceless, amorphous "World Economy".

    BAD LUCK EVERYONE.

  4. #24
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default

    YOU KNOW THAT YOU WERE LIED TO BY THE AUTHOR OF THE PUZZLE BOOK FOR A TREASURE-HUNT COMPETITION WITH A ONE MILLION POUND PRIZE FOR THE FIRST PERSON TO SOLVE THAT PUZZLE, WHEN THE AUTHOR IN THE BOOK'S "Author Notes" STATES OF THAT PUZZLE THAT "It takes no special knowledge to solve", AND THEN

    six years later, the puzzle has not been solved, the prize has not been won, and the company ends the competition,

    AND THEN

    an incomplete PDF solution appears, which reveals that a big important part of the book's puzzle is the Ten Sephirot, the central mystical symbol of a Jewish mystical tradition known as the KABBALAH, a tradition that was adopted and re-interpreted by Renaissance Christian Mystics. The Ten Sephirot, when represented in a diagram, are arranged in a distinctive and particular pattern. If the reader is not aware of this distinctive shape, they will not look for it, nor, if looking for a symmetrical shape of a sort, recognize it. Yet the Author of the book does not consider the Ten Sephirot nor their shape to be a "special knowledge".
    WE DIE TO KNOW

  5. #25
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default

    Where is member JailLockups? And CoffeeFroth?
    WE DIE TO KNOW

  6. #26
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default 1,000,000 gbp

    A comic-strip. By Me. It's not funny.

    WE DIE TO KNOW

  7. #27
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default

    QUOTE JLOCKEST
    Thoughts and Findings related to the Maranatha "Key" Pt. II
    "But you ducked the question anyway Ruby - as the spokesperson, surely you are aware of the facts that support D's ideas. So what are the facts Ruby?"
    END QUOTE

    I consider Duncan to be the highest authority on his own solution to the church's statuary, besides myself, so if you wont accept Duncan's own solution from Duncan, then why would you be more likely to accept his solution from me?
    WE DIE TO KNOW

  8. #28
    jlockest is offline Expert Twelever Sapphire jlockest is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubyfelixir View Post
    QUOTE JLOCKEST
    Thoughts and Findings related to the Maranatha "Key" Pt. II
    "But you ducked the question anyway Ruby - as the spokesperson, surely you are aware of the facts that support D's ideas. So what are the facts Ruby?"
    END QUOTE

    I consider Duncan to be the highest authority on his own solution to the church's statuary, besides myself, so if you wont accept Duncan's own solution from Duncan, then why would you be more likely to accept his solution from me?
    I never asked for a solution. I asked for the facts that lead to the LRB - and as the spokesperson of PPubs I assumed (obviously incorrectly) you would know them. If you don't, just say.

  9. #29
    Rubyfelixir's Avatar
    Rubyfelixir is offline Twelever Silver Rubyfelixir is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    In Australia.
    Posts
    383

    Default

    I thought that "the D's ideas" that we were talking about was Duncan's Masonic solution to the church statuary.
    WE DIE TO KNOW

  10. #30
    jlockest is offline Expert Twelever Sapphire jlockest is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,661

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rubyfelixir View Post
    I thought that "the D's ideas" that we were talking about was Duncan's Masonic solution to the church statuary.
    No idea what you may be talking about Ruby, but I'm just talking about what I posted on the other thread:-
    '.....H,
    I'm not sure he got the 'footfall' that he expected.
    The whole situation since the demise of the LRB seems a bit surreal don't you think?
    The alleged raison d'etre of the team was to sift through the dross surrounding RLC and get to the facts - and in doing that they found something 'factual' that was of such great importance that they had to release it to the public.
    It seems to me that the snag is now that in the 'exposes' that D has made since the demise of the LRB, none of them include any 'facts' that can be directly seen to 'illuminate' RLC. His release here, then on Arcadia and finally in his own blog seems to be the sort of stuff that the 'team' felt the urge to sift through to establish the facts in the first place. On top of that, the LRB spawned loads of 'stuff' by the puzzlers themselves that just added to the mountain of 'stuff' surrounding RLC. So the whole exercise seems just to have compounded the problem of 'what is true about RLC'. ......'

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts